During the override sessions last week, both Chambers passed S55 which was the “Squatters” Bill sans the language about pet shops. I assume the Governor will sign that Bill. He claimed that he would’ve without the pet shops provision. The author of this article states that the legislation was effectively put into the “trash” which is completely misleading.
During the override sessions last week, both Chambers passed S55 which was the “Squatters” Bill sans the language about pet shops. I assume the Governor will sign that Bill. He claimed that he would’ve without the pet shops provision. The author of this article states that the legislation was effectively put into the “trash” which is completely misleading.
Fair enough. But it was an unnecessary step
Misleading is what the author does. I agree about the line item veto thing but it wouldn’t be needed if it weren’t for the gerrymandered GOP majority.
Now that's a bit harsh!